中国与英国宠物饲料宣称：功能咀嚼按饲料管，不是药

In China and the UK a functional chew is judged as feed, not as a human dietary supplement and not as a veterinary medicine. Waving "GMP" as a personality trait does not replace that. Once the carton talks like a diagnosis, you have a different problem.

I am not your counsel in Beijing or London. This is how a plant in Shenzhen answers the brief when you name those countries. Official starting points: China's enterprise record on GSXT; UK FSA pet food guidance; UK animal feed legislation; EU Regulation 767/2009 on placing feed on the market (still the claim logic UK businesses get pointed to); FEDIAF for industry nutrition and labelling practice in Europe.

Feed, not medicine

China manages pet food as pet feed under the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs framework. Complete feed, additive premix feed, and other pet feed are different buckets. A daily kibble and a vitamin chew do not share every rule. Disease prevention and treatment claims on feed are the red line.

The UK treats pet food as animal feed. The Food Standards Agency and local authorities (Trading Standards) sit on businesses that make or sell it. Registration of the feed business is a UK-side job for the brand or the importer, not a sticker we print in Shenzhen.

Our domestic manufacturing permission for pet additive premixed feed is Jiangsu feed licence 苏饲预（2026）12006 (26 April 2026 to 25 April 2031). Foreign buyers rarely ask for it first. Quality teams sometimes do. Have the PDF. Legal name Shenzhen Enbeichong Co., Ltd., code 91321283MA1MR5HB8P.

Ingredients are a catalogue problem

China works from permitted feed materials and additives. A trendy botanical that sells on Amazon US is not automatically legal in a Chinese feed formula. Probiotics in particular are strain-list problems. If China is a destination, say so in week one. We will not discover a banned strain at the dock.

The UK and EU work from authorised additives and safety rules. "Unsafe feed cannot be placed on the market" is the FSA's plain version. FEDIAF nutritional guidelines are what many European brands use as the complete-diet reference. A complementary chew on top of complete feed is not a licence to overdose vitamin A.

What you can say

China: nutritional and certain function claims that you can support. Not "prevents kidney disease."

UK / EU: Regulation 767/2009 Article 13 is the sentence lawyers actually quote. Claims must be objective, verifiable, and understandable. "Supports joint mobility" is a different universe from "treats arthritis."

Direct translation of a US Amazon bullet into Chinese or English-UK is how listings die. Name the country in the brief so artwork is a compliance pass, not a copy deck.

Labels are documents

China expects official ingredient naming, descending order by weight, and claimed ingredients actually declared. The UK expects category, analytical constituents, additives where required, feeding instructions, batch identification, and a responsible operator. Batch codes have to match the COA. See how to read a COA.

If you sell both markets, plan two labels. One bilingual PDF is not two legal labels.

US rules are a third file: does the FDA regulate pet supplements.

Send the country list first. Inquiry.